Why the Teach-Back method is effective?

Asking what consumers recall and restate what they have been told is one of the top consumer safety practices

Download

  1. Samuels-Kalow ME, Stack AM, Porter SC. Effective discharge communication in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:152–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wimsett J, Harper A, Jones P. Review article: Components of a good quality discharge summary: a systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26(5):430–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke C, Friedman SM, Shi K, Arenovich T, Monzon J, Culligan C. Emergency department discharge instructions comprehension and compliance study. CJEM. 2005;7:5–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:314–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohl CM, Abu-Laban RB, Brubacher JR, et al. Adherence to emergency department discharge prescriptions. CJEM. 2009;11:131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hastings SN, Barrett A, Weinberger M, et al. Older patients’ understanding of emergency department discharge information and its relationship with adverse outcomes. J Patient Saf. 2011;7(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkins PS, Beckett MW. Audit of unexpected return visits to an accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1992;9:352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheikh H, Brezar A, Dzwonek A, Yau L, Calder LA. Patient understanding of discharge instructions in the emergency department: do different patients need different approaches? Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marty H, Bogenstatter Y, Franc G, Tschan F, Zimmermann H. How well informed are patients when leaving the emergency department? comparing information provided and information retained. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(1):53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vashi A, Rhodes KV. “Sign right here and you're good to go”: a content analysis of audiotaped emergency department discharge instructions. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(4):315–322.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engel KG, Buckley BA, Forth VE, et al. Patient understanding of emergency department discharge instructions: where are knowledge deficits greatest? Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(9):E1035–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel KG, Heisler M, Smith DM, Robinson CH, Forman JH, Ubel PA. Patient comprehension of emergency department care and instructions: are patients aware of when they do not understand? Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(4):454–461.e15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crane JA. Patient comprehension of doctor-patient communication on discharge from the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1997;15:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Musso MW, Perret JN, Sanders T, et al. Patients’ comprehension of their emergency department encounter: a pilot study using physician observers. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65(2):151–5.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slater BA, Huang Y, Dalawari P. The impact of teach-back method on retention of key domains of emergency department discharge instructions. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(5):e59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin MJ, Tirosh AG, Landry A. Examining patient comprehension of emergency department discharge instructions: Who says they understand when they do not? Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(8):993–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams DM, Counselman FL, Caggiano CD. Emergency department discharge instructions and patient literacy: a problem of disparity. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14:19–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell EJ, Takhar SS, Beloff JR, Schuur JD, Landman AB. Information technology improves emergency department patient discharge instructions completeness and performance on a national quality measure: a quasi-experimental study. Appl Clin Inform. 2013;4(4):499–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Atzema CL, Austin PC, Wu L, et al. Speak fast, use jargon, and don’t repeat yourself: a randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of online videos to supplement emergency department discharge instructions. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e77057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffey RT, Shin N, Jones S, et al. The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: a randomized, controlled study. J Commun Healthc. 2015;8:10–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kornburger C, Gibson C, Sadowski S, Maletta K, Klingbeil C. Using “teach-back” to promote a safe transition from hospital to home: an evidence-based approach to improving the discharge process. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(3):282–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Samuels-Kalow M, Hardy E, Rhodes K, Mollen C. “Like a dialogue”: Teach-back in the emergency department. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(4):549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Caplin M, Saunders T. Utilizing teach-back to reinforce patient education: a step-by-step approach. Orthop Nurs. 2015;34(6):365–8 quiz 369-70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhodes KV, Vieth T, He T, et al. Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:262–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ackermann S, Ghanim L, Heierle A, et al. Information structuring improves recall of emergency discharge information: a randomized clinical trial. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(6):646–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 


Page 2

  Control group Intervention group Overall p value
N = 239 N = 244 N = 483
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Age (years) 52.41 (19.45) 49.95 (18.98) 51.17 (19.24) 0.160
 Young adulthood (18–34) 49 (20.5) 64 (26.2) 113 (23.4) 0.275
 Middle adulthood (35–64) 122 (51.0) 121 (49.6) 243 (50.3)
 Late adulthood (≥ 65) 68 (28.5) 59 (24.2) 127 (26.3)
Gender     0.254
 Male 112 (46.9) 127 (52.0) 239 (49.5)
 Female 127 (53.1) 117 (48.0) 244 (50.5)
Education level*     0.047
 Lower education 57 (23.8) 69 (29.0) 126 (26.4)
 Intermediate education 96 (40.2) 70 (29.4) 166 (34.8)
 Higher education 86 (36.0) 99 (41.6) 185 (38.8)
Complexity of problem**     0.967
 Low 112 (46.9) 112 (45.9) 224 (46.4)
 Medium 57 (23.8) 58 (23.8) 115 (23.8)
 High 70 (29.3) 74 (30.3) 144 (29.8)
Peak time (yes)*** 162 (67.8) 107 (43.9) 269 (55.7) 0.000

  1. *6 missing education levels in the intervention group
  2. **Low: fractures, contusions, wounds, hematomas; Medium: e.g., simple infections, kidney- or gallstones, stomach/rectal pain, bladder retention, hyperventilation; High: e.g., neurological (traumatic brain injury, headache), thromboembolic and cardiovascular diseases, multiple diagnoses
  3. ***2–7 PM, based on previous analysis of peak hours on our ED in the last 2 years