What refers to employees beliefs in the degree to which they influence their work environment their components of meaningful of their job and their perceived autonomy?

1. Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1986. pp. 7–24. [Google Scholar]

2. Turner JC. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social-cognitive theory of group behavior In: Lawler EJ, editor. Advances in group processes. Greenwich,CT: JAI Press; 1985. Vol. 2, pp. 77–122. [Google Scholar]

3. Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13: 103–123. 10.1002/job.4030130202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Bergami M, Bagozzi RP. Self-categorization, affective commitment, and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2000;39: 555–577. 10.1348/014466600164633 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Hogg MA, Terry DJ. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad Manag Rev. 2000;25: 121–140. 10.2307/259266 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Meyer JP, Herscovitch L. Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Hum Resour Manag R. 2001;11: 299–326. 10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manag R. 1991;1: 61–89. 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Meyer JP, Becker TE, van Dick R. Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. J Organ Behav. 2006;27: 665–683. 10.1002/job.383 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14:20–39. 10.2307/258189 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. van Dick R. My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol. 2004;19: 171–203. [Google Scholar]

11. van Knippenberg D, Sleebos E. Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. J Organ Behav. 2006;27: 571–584. 10.1002/job.359 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66: 358–384. 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Ellemers N, De Gilder D, Haslam SA. Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad Manag Rev. 2004;29: 459–478. 10.5465/AMR.2004.13670967 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. O'Reilly C, Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71: 492–499. 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Meyer JP, Becker TE, Vandenberghe C. Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89: 991–1007. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Becker TE. Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? Acad Manag J. 1992;35: 232–244. 10.2307/256481 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. J Manag. 2008;34: 325–374. 10.1177/0149206308316059 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Billig M, Tajfel H. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1973;3: 27–52. [Google Scholar]

19. Brewer MB. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychol Bull. 1979;86: 307–324. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy RP, Flament C. Social categorization and intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1971;1: 149–178. [Google Scholar]

21. Jackson JW. Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identification and perceived intergroup conflict. Self Identity. 2002;1: 11–33. 10.1080/152988602317232777 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Dovidio JF, Brigham JC, Johnson BT, Gaertner SL. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look In: Macrae CN, Stangor C, Hewstone M, editors. Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press; 1996. pp. 276–322. [Google Scholar]

23. Mackie DM., Smith ER. Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review. 1998;105: 499–529. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.499 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Park B, Judd CM. Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9: 108–130. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975. [Google Scholar]

26. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72: 617–626. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Marique G, Stinglhamber F. Identification to proximal targets and affective organizational commitment: The mediating role of organizational identification. J Pers Psychol. 2011;10: 107–117. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Carmeli A, Gilat G, Weisberg J. Perceived external prestige, organizational identification and affective commitment: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Reputation Rev. 2006;9: 92–104. 10.157/palgrave.crr.1550014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Marique G, Stinglhamber F, Desmette D, Caesens G, De Zanet F. The relationship between perceived organizational support and affective commitment: A social identity perspective. Group Organ Manag. 2013;38: 68–100. 10.1177/1059601112457200 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Finkel SE. Causal analysis with panel data Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. [Google Scholar]

31. Kaplan D. Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01142 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Lang J, Bliese PD, Lang JWB, Adler AB. Work gets unfair for the depressed: Cross-lagged relations between organizational justice perceptions and depressive symptoms. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96: 602–618. 10.1037/a0022463 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Tonolnytsky L. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J Vocat Behav. 2002;61: 20–52. 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997. [Google Scholar]

35. Wayne SJ, Coyle-Shapiro JA-M, Eisenberger R, Liden RC, Rousseau DM, Shore LM Social influences In: Klein HJ, Becker TE, Meyer JP, editors. Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. pp. 253–284. [Google Scholar]

36. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71: 500–507. 10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.500 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F. Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees Washington, DC: APA Books; 2011. [Google Scholar]

38. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R, Armeli S. Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86: 825–836. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Lee J, Peccei R. Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. J Organ Behav. 2007;28: 661–685. 10.1002/job.431 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Liden RC, Sparrowe RT, Wayne SJ. Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag. 1997;15: 47–119. [Google Scholar]

41. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85: 407–416. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Eisenberger R, Karagonlar G, Stinglhamber F, Neves P, Becker TE, Gonzalez-Morales M G, et al. Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95: 1085–1103. 10.1037/a0020858 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski IL, Rhoades L. Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87: 565–573. 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.565 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Levinson H. Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Admin Sci Quart. 1965;9: 370–390. [Google Scholar]

45. Dunham RB, Grube JA, Castañeda MB. Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79: 370–380. 10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.370 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92: 1332–1356. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. J Appl Psychol. 1975;60: 159–170. 10.1037/h0076546 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Bell SJ, Menguc B. The employee-organization relationship, organizational citizenship behaviors, and superior service quality. J Retailing. 2002;78: 131–146. 10.1016/s0022-4359(02)00069-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Edwards MR, Peccei R. Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes: Testing a simultaneous multifoci model. J Pers Psychol. 2010;9: 17–26. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Sluss DM, Klimchak M, Holmes JJ. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. J Vocat Behav. 2008;73: 457–464. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. Tangirala S, Green SG, Ramanujam R. In the shadow of the boss's boss: Effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92: 309–320. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.309 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Apker J, Ford WSZ, Fox DH. Predicting nurses' organizational and professional identification: The effect of nursing roles, professional autonomy, and supportive communication. Nurs Econ. 2003;21: 226–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. Bamber EM, Iyer VM. Big 5 auditors' professional and organizational identification: Consistency or conflict? Auditing: J Pract Theor. 2002;21: 21–38. 10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Lievens F, Van Hoye G, Anseel F. Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifying framework. Brit J Manag. 2007;18: 45–59. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00525.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

55. Pratt MG. Social identity dynamics in modern organizations: An organizational psychology/organizational behavior perspective In: Hogg MA, Terry DJ, editors. Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2001. pp. 13–30. [Google Scholar]

56. Dess GG, Shaw JD. Voluntary turnover, social capital and organizational performance. Acad Manag Rev. 2001;26: 446–456. 10.5465/AMR.2001.4845830 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Kacmar KM, Andrews MC, Van Rooy DL, Steinberg RC, Cerrone S. Sure everyone can be replaced… but at what cost: turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Acad Manag J. 2006;49: 133–144. 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785670 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Terry DJ, Smith JR, Smith LGE, Amiot CE, Callan VJ. Getting new staff to stay: The mediating role of organizational identification. Brit J Manag. 2012;23: 45–64. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00728.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

59. Maertz CP, Griffeth RW. Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. J Manag. 2004;30: 667–683. 10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

60. van Dick R, Christ O, Stellmacher J, Wagner U, Ahlswede O, Grubba C, et al. Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. Brit J Manag. 2004;15: 351–360. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Pratt MG. To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification In: Whetten DA, Godfrey PC, editors. Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage; 1998. pp. 171–205. [Google Scholar]

62. Goodman JS, Blum TC. Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. J Manag. 1996;22: 627–652. 10.1177/014920639602200405 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. American Psychological Association Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. Am Psychol. 2002;57: 1060–1073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material In: Triandis HC, Berry JW, editors. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1980. pp. 398–444. [Google Scholar]

65. Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78: 538–551. 10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.538 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Riketta M, van Dick R. Commitment's place in the literature In: Klein HJ, Becker TE, Meyer JP, editors. Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. pp. 69–95. [Google Scholar]

67. Conway JM, Lance CE. What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. J Bus Psychol. 2010;25: 325–334. 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

68. Becker TE. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ Res Methods. 2005;8: 274–289. 10.1177/1094428105278021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

69. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: User’s reference guide Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; 1993. [Google Scholar]

70. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 1995;6: 219–247. 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

71. Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav. 2006;27: 1089–1120. 10.1002/job.408 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

72. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]

73. Carsten JM, Spector PE. Unemployment, job satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of the Muchinsky model. J Appl Psychol. 1987;72: 374–381. 10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.374 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

74. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N. Data analysis in social psychology In: Gilbert D, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1998. Vol. 1, pp. 233–265. [Google Scholar]

75. MacKinnon DP. Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research In: Cázares A, Beatty L, editors. Scientific methods for prevention intervention research. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1994. NIDA Monograph N°139, pp. 127–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

76. MacKinnon DP. Contrasts in multiple mediator models In: Rose J, Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ, editors. Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2000. pp. 141–160. [Google Scholar]

77. MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000;1: 173–181. 10.1023/A:1026595011371 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

78. Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7: 422–445. 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

79. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40: 879–891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

80. Edwards MR, Peccei R. Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2007;16: 25–57. 10.1080/13594320601088195 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

81. van Dick R. Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. Int J Manag Rev. 2001;3: 265–283. 10.1111/1468-2370.00068 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

82. Abrams D, de Moura GR. Organizational identification: Psychological anchorage and turnover In: Hogg MA, Terry DJ, editors. Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2001. pp. 131–147. [Google Scholar]

83. Klein HJ, Becker TE, Meyer JP, editors. Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. [Google Scholar]

84. Cooper D, Thatcher SMB. Identification in organizations: The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Acad Manag Rev. 2010;35: 516–538. [Google Scholar]

85. Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Brockner J. Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model. J Manag. 2007;33: 841–866. 10.1177/0149206307307635 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

86. Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Liden RC. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Acad Manag J. 1997;40: 82–111. 10.2307/257021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

87. Eisenberger R, Shoss MK, Karagonlar G, Gonzalez-Morales MG, Wickham RE, Buffardi LC. The supervisor POS-LMX-subordinate POS chain: Moderation by reciprocation wariness and supervisor's organizational embodiment. J Organ Behav. 2014;35: 635–656. 10.1002/job.1877 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

88. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87: 698–714. 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

89. Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S. A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J Manag. 2000;26: 463–488. 10.1177/014920630002600305 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

90. Tett RP, Meyer JP. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Pers Psychol. 1993;46: 259–293. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

91. Maruyama GM. Basics of structural equation modeling Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. [Google Scholar]

92. Ashforth BE, Sluss DM, Harrison SH. Socialization in organizational contexts In: Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. pp. 1–70. [Google Scholar]

93. Amiot CE, de la Sablonnière R, Terry DJ, Smith JR. Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive-developmental model. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11: 364–388. 10.1177/1088868307304091 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

94. Kim J, Song E, Lee S. Organizational change and employee organizational identification: Mediation of perceived uncertainty. Soc Behav Personal. 2013;41: 1019–1034. 10.2224/sbp.2013.41.6.1019 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

95. Saks AM., Ashforth BE. Organizational socialization: making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. J Vocat Behav. 1997;51: 234–279. 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1614 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

96. Vandenberg RJ, Stanley LJ. Statistical and methodological challenges for commitment researchers: Issues of invariance, change across time, and profile differences In: Klein HJ, Becker TE, Meyer JP, editors. Commitment in organizations: Accumulated wisdom and new directions. New-York: Routledge; 2009. pp. 383–416. [Google Scholar]

97. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88: 879–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

98. Spector PE. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organ Res Methods. 2006;9: 221–232. 10.1177/1094428105284955 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

99. Tyler TR, Blader SL. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7: 349–361. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

100. Fuller JB, Hester K, Barnett T, Frey L, Relyea C, Beu D. Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Hum Relat. 2006;59: 815–846. 10.1177/0018726706067148 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

101. Aryee S, Chen ZX. Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. J Bus Res. 2006;59: 793–801. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.03.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

102. Northouse PG. Leadership: Theory and practice 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010. [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Study 1: Descriptive Statistics and Intercorrelations Among Variables.