What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.1

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.2

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.3

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.4

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.5

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.6

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.7

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.8

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.9

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.10

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.11

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.12

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.13

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.14

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.15

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.16

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.17

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.18

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.19

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.20

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.21

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.22

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.23

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.24

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.25

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.26

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.27

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.28

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.29

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.30

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.31

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.32

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.33

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.34

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.35

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

Fig. 15.36

What barium-filled anatomic structure is best demonstrated in the LPO projection?

  • Chen YM, Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, et al. Multiphasic examination of the esophagogastric region for strictures, rings, and hiatal hernia: evaluation of the individual techniques. Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10:311–6.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cumberland DC. Optimum viscosity of barium suspension for use in the double contrast barium meal. Gastrointest Radiol. 1977;2:169–74.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand DW. High density, low viscosity barium for fine mucosal detail on double-contrast upper gastrointestinal examinations. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:831–3.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi Y, Levine MS, Laufer I, et al. Value of flow technique for double-contrast examination of the stomach. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:1183–4.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kressel HY, Laufer I. Principles of double contrast diagnosis. In: Laufer I, editor. Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology with endoscopic correlation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1979. p. 19–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer I. A simple method for routine double contrast study of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Radiology. 1975;117:513–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer I, Kressel HY. Principles of double contrast diagnosis. In: Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, editors. Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology. Thirdth ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 8–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Herlinger H, et al. Double-contrast upper gastrointestinal examination: technique and interpretation. Radiology. 1988;165:593–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglinte DDT, Caudill LD, Krol KL, et al. The minimum effective dose of glucagon in upper gastrointestinal radiography. Gastrointest Radiol. 1982;7:119–22.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RE, Chernish SM, Skukas J, et al. Hypotonic roentgenography with glucagon. Am J Roentgenol. 1974;121:264–74.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ott DJ, Chen YM, Hewson EG, et al. Esophageal motility: assessment with synchronous videotape fluoroscopy and manometry. Radiology. 1989;173:419–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubesin SE. Gallery of double-contrast terminology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1995;24:259–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubesin SE, Herlinger H. The effect of barium suspension viscosity on the delineation of areae gastricae. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:35–8.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubesin SE, Levine MS, Laufer I. Review for residents – double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography: a pattern approach for diseases of the stomach. Radiology. 2008;246:33–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shirakabe H, Kobayashi S, Maruyama M. Principles and application of double contrast radiography. In: Shirakabe H, Nishizawa M, Maruyama M, Kobayashi S, editors. Atlas of x-ray diagnosis of early gastric cancer. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin; 1982. p. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references