Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data or results in mixed methods studies

Beck, Mark. 2016. “Examining Doctoral Attrition: A Self-Determination Theory Approach.” The Nebraska Educator: A Student-led Journal 33: 5-19. https://doi.org/10.13014/K2JW8BSG.

Brinkmann, Svend and Steinar Kvale, eds. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Bryman, Alan. 2006. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.

Bryman, Alan. 2007. “Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531.

Cardona, Julio. 2013. “Determined to Succeed: Motivation Towards Doctoral Degree Completion.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/99774.

Chu, Heting. 2015. “Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis.” Library & Information Science Research 37 (1): 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003.

Corbin, Juliet M. and Anselm Strauss, eds. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Creamer, Elizabeth. 2017. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Crist, Emily, and Elizabeth Berman. 2016. “Mixed Methods Research in LIS Literature: A Scoping Review.” https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/libfacpub/39.

Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. 2002. Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Ellingson, R. 2009. Engaging in Crystallization in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Farmer, Tracy, Kerry Robinson, Susan J. Elliott, and John Eyles. 2006. “Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (3): 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285708.

Fetters, Michael, and José F. Molina-Azorin. 2017. “The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (3): 291-307, https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066.

Fidel, Raya. 2008. “Are We There Yet? Mixed Methods Research in Library and Information Science.” Library & Information Science Research 30: 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.001.

Fitzpatrick, Kate. 2016. “Points of Convergence in Music Education: The Use of Data Labels as a Strategy for Mixed Methods Integration.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 10 (3): 273-291.

Granikov, Vera, Quan N. Hong, Emily Crist, and Pierre Pluye. 2020. “Mixed Methods Research in Library and Information Science: A Methodological Review.” Library and Information Science Research 42 (1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003.

Hands, Africa. 2018. “LIS Doctoral Student Motivation: An Exploratory Study of Motivating Factors for Earning the PhD.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.120828.

Hegarty, Niall. 2010. “Application of the Academic Motivation Scale to Graduate School Students.” The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning 6 (2): 48-55. http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/6%20Niall%20Hegarty.pdf.

Heselhurst, Nicola, Sarah Dinsdale, Gillian Sedgewick, Helen Simpson, Seema Sen, Carolyn Dawn Summerbell and Judith Rankin. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Implementation of Maternal Obesity Pathways of Care: A Mixed Methods Study with Data Integration.” PLoS One 10 (5): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127122.

Julien, Heidi, and Christine Fena. 2018. “Thirty-One Years of Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science: A Content Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 42 (1-2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.29173/cais983.

Johnson, Rebecca, Amy L. Grove, and Aileen Clarke. 2017. “Pillar Integration Process: A Joint Display Technique to Integrate Data in Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 13 (3): 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689817743108.

Johnson, R. Burke, Anthony Onwuegbuzie and Lisa A. Turner. 2007. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2): 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689806298224.

Kemp, Matthew W., Timothy J. Molloy, Marina Pajic and Elaine Chapman. 2014. “An Analysis of Reported Motivational Orientation in Students Undertaking Doctoral Studies in the Biomedical Sciences.” BMC Medical Education 14 (38): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-38.

Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba. 2013. The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

Maxwell, Joseph, and Diane Loomis. 2003. “Mixed Methods Design: An Alternative Approach.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie, 241-272. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

McCarthy, Grace. 2016. “Appling Self-Determination Theory to Improve Completion Rates in a Part-Time Professional Doctoral Program.” In Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education: Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, edited by Patrick Blessinger and Denise Stockley, 207-223. Bradford, UK: Emerald.

Merriam, Sharan. 2009. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Moran-Ellis, Jo, Victoria D. Alexander, Ann Cronin, Mary Dickinson, Jane Fielding, Judith Sleney, and Hilary Thomas. 2006. “Triangulation and Integration: Processes, Claims and Implications.” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794106058870.

Morgan, David L. 2007. “Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2345678906292462.

Morgan, David L. 2014. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mosyjowski, Erika A., Shanna R. Daly, and Diane L. Peters. 2017. “Drivers of Research Topic Selection for Engineering Doctoral Students.” International Journal of Engineering Education 33 (4): 1283-1296. http://dalyresearch.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/237/2018/02/Drivers-of-research-topic-selection-for-engineering-doctoral-students.pdf.

O’Cathain, Alicia, Elizabeth Murphy, and Jon Nicholl. 2010. “Three Techniques for Integrating Data in Mixed Methods Studies.” British Medical Journal 341: 1147-1150. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4587.

Petrelli, Heather. 2014. “Predictors of Academic Motivation in Pharmacy School Applicants.” Ph.D. diss., Barry University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1533541070/abstract/472CC7CACCD14B93PQ/1.

Plano Clark, V. 2019. “Meaningful Integration Within Mixed Methods Studies: Identifying Why, What, When, and How.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 57: 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.007.

Pluye, Pierre, Roland Grad, Alissa Levine, and Belinda Nicolau. 2009. “Understanding Divergence of Quantitative and Qualitative Data (Or Results) in Mixed Methods Studies.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 3: 58-72. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.3.1.58.

Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Josef Fruehwald, Keelan Evanini and Jiahong Yuan. 2011. “Automatic Alignment and Analysis of Linguistic Change - Transcription Guidelines.” http://fave.ling.upenn.edu.

Ryan, Richard, and Edward Deci. 2000. “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation oIntrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

Ryan, Richard, and Edward Deci. 2017. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, And Wellness. New York: Guilford Press.

Sanscartier, Matthew. 2020. “The Craft Attitude: Navigating Mess in Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 14 (1): 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689818816248.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Tavakol, Mohsen and Reg Dennick. 2011. “Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha.” International Journal of Medical Education 2: 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd.

Vallerand, Robert J., Luc G. Pelletier, Marc R. Blais, Nathalie M. Brière, Caroline Senécal

and Evelyne F. Vallieres. 1992. “The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52: 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164492052004025.

  1. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:1147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Eyles J. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:377–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.

  4. Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Little P, Stuart B, Francis N, et al. The effect of web-based training in communication skills and an interactive patient booklet and the use of a CRP point of care test in acute respiratory tract infection (RTI): a multi-national cluster randomised factorial controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9899):1175–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tonkin-Crine S, Anthierens S, Francis N, et al. Exploring patients’ views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six country European qualitative study. NPJ Prim Care Resp Med. 2014;24:14026.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, Cals JW, et al. Clinicians’ views and experiences of interventions to enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. J Gen Int Med. 2015;30(4):408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yardley L, Douglas E, Anthierens S, et al. Evaluation of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing in six European countries; quantitative process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2013;8:134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, Douglas E, et al. General practitioners’ views on the acceptability and applicability of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in multiple European countries: a qualitative study prior to a randomised trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Teddlie C. A framework for analysing data in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003. p. 351–83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coenen S, Michiels B, Renard D, Denekens J, Van Royen P. Antibiotics for coughing in general practice: the effect of perceived patient demand. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:181–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coenen S, Francis N, Kelly M, et al. Are patient views about antibiotics related to clinician perceptions, management and outcome? A multi-country study in outpatients with acute cough. Plos One. 2013;8(10):e76691.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler CC, Simpson S, Wood F. General practitioners’ perceptions of introducing near-patient testing for common infections into routine primary care: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wood F, Brookes-Howell L, Hood K, et al. A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians’ and patients’ views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection. Fam Pract. 2011;28:661–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cals JW, Butler CC, Dinant GJ. ‘Experience talks’: physician prioritisation of contrasting interventions to optimise management of acute cough in general practice. Implement Sci. 2009;4:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. NICE. Pneumonia: diagnosis and management of community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults. NICE guidelines [CG191], December 2014.

  18. Cals JW, de Bock L, Beckers PJ, Francis NA, Hopstaken RM, Hood K, de Bont EG, Butler CC, Dinant GJ. Enhanced communication skills and C-reactive protein point-of-care testing for respiratory tract infection: 3.5-year follow-up of a cluster randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(2):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Francis N, Wood F, Simpson S, Hood K, Butler CC. Developing an ‘interactive’ booklet on respiratory tract infections in children for use in primary care consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:286–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bekkers MJ, Simpson SA, Dunstan F, et al. Enhancing the quality of antibiotic prescribing in primary care: qualitative evaluation of a blended learning intervention. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M. Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Coxeter P, Del Mar C, McGregor L, Beller E, Hoffmann T. Interventions to facilitate shared decision making to address antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;11(Art. No.:CD010907):1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Protheroe J, Bower P, Chew-Graham C. The use of mixed methodology in evaluating complex interventions: identifying patient factors that moderate the effect of a decision aid. Fam Pract. 2007;24:594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Pall Med. 2011;25(8):748–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Multi-disciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:1574–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moffatt S, White M, Mackintosh J, et al. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research what happens when mixed method findings conflict? BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;628(47).


Page 2

  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Press center
  • Support and Contact
  • Leave feedback
  • Careers

Follow BMC

  • BMC Twitter page
  • BMC Facebook page
  • BMC Weibo page