What are customer perceptions that the product quality is excellent for the price offered?

  • Aslam, H, (2017). Top 10 best selling jeans brands 2016–2017. Retrieved from //www.strongestinworld.com/best-selling-jeans-brands/.

  • Aydinli, A., Bertini, M., & Lambrecht, A. (2014). Price promotion for emotional impact. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer, P. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, E. N., & Walton, J. R. (1980). Contextual influences on consumer price responses: An experimental analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A., & Burton, S. (1993). Consumer perceptions of tensile price claims in advertisements: An assessment of claim types across different discount levels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(3), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. (2007). “Says who?!” How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un)fairness. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebat, J., Filiatrault, P., & Gdlinas-Chebat, C. (1995). Impact of waiting attribution and consumer’s mood on perceived quality. Journal of Business Research, 34, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebat, J.-C., & Michon, R. (2003). Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers’ emotions, cognition, and spending: A test of competitive causal theories. Journal of Marketing, 56, 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y.-C. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., Stanyer, M., & Kim, M. (2010). Consumer responses to the depth and minimum claimed savings of “Scratch and Save (SAS)” promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 27(8), 766–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2002). Beyond first impressions: The effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Anderson, R. D. (2005). Reassessing the pleasures of store shopping. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 250–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W. (2003). Fairness and the subjective value of a bargain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorzdenko, R., & Jensen, M. (2005). Risk and maximum acceptable discount levels. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(4), 264–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumana, T., & Mattilab, A. S. (2005). The role of affective factors on perceived cruise vacation value. Tourism Management, 26, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, K. C., & Istook, C. (2006). Young adults’ intent to purchase based on garment attriutes. Proceedings of International Textiles and Apparel Association, Consumer Behavior, 63, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women’s apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, K. (2015). Jean genie: The denim evaluation. BBC News. Retrieved from //www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150401-jean-genie-the-denim-evolution.

  • Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998a). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998b). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46, 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heussler, T., Huber, F., Meyer, F., Vollhardt, K., & Ahlert, D. (2009). Moderating effects of emotion on the perceived fairness of price increases. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 332–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honea, H., & Dahl, D. W. (2005). The promotion affect scale: Defining the affective dimensions of promotion. Journal of Business Research, 58, 543–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2004). Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C., & Liu, B. S. (1998). The role of mood in price promotions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(2), 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. C., Chang, Y. T., Yeh, C. Y., & Liao, C. W. (2014). Promote the price promotion: The effects of price promotions on customer evaluations in coffee chain stores. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(7), 1065–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., Sternquist, B., & Koh, A. (2003). Price as hedonic shopping. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 31(4), 378–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, S. (2007). Hedonism and culture: Impact on shopping behaviour a research agenda. Vikalpa, 32(3), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2007). Hedonic usage of product virtualization technologies in online apparel shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(6), 502–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Hong, H. (2011). Fashion leadership and hedonic shopping motivations of female consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(4), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocas, C., & Bohlmann, J. D. (2008). Segmented switcher and retailer pricing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, H. H., Trail, G., & James, J. D. (2007). The mediating role of perceived value: Team identification and purchase intention of team-licensed apparel. Journal of Sport Management, 21(4), 540–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. E., & Stoel, L. (2016). An unintended consequence of exaggerated maximum-discount tensile price claims. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(7), 700–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., & Tsai, C. I. (2014). How price promotions influence postpurchase consumption experience over time. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 943–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structural modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mano, H., & Elliott, M. (1997). Smart shopping: The origins and consequences of price savings. In D. MacInnis & M. Brucks (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 504–510). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). The basic emotional impact of environments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38(1), 283–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2013). Consumption and its consequences. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. B. (2003). Price and consumers’ perceptions of value (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluation. In J. Jacoby & J. Olson (Eds.), The perception of merchandise and store quality (pp. 209–232). Lexington: Lexington Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, J. L., & Grewal, D. (2001). The effects of alternative price promotional methods on consumers’ product evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R. W., Raghunathan, R., & Ramanathan, S. (2006). Promotions spontaneously induce a positive evaluative response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R., & Lamber, D. R. (2001). The emotional side of price. Psychology & Marketing, 18(3), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermiller, C, & Bitner, M.J. (1984). Store atmosphere: A peripheral cue for product evaluation. In D.C., Stewart (Ed.), American Psychological Association Annual Conference Proceedings, Consumer, Psychology Division. USA, p. 52–53.

  • Palma, D., de Dios Ortúzar, J., Rizzi, L. I., Guevara, C. A., Casaubon, G., & Ma, H. (2016). Modeling choice when price is a cue for quality: A case study with Chinese wine consumers. Journal of Choice Modelling, 19, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peine, K., Heitmann, M., & Herrmann, A. (2009). Getting a feel for price affect: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of consumers’ emotional responses to price information. Psychology & Marketing, 26(1), 39–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghubir, P., Inman, J. J., & Grande, H. (2004). The three faces of consumer promotions. California Management Review, 46(4), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rungtrakulchai, R. (2013). The relationship between price deals, perceived quality, and brand equity for a high involvement product. AU Journal of Management, 11(2), 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, R. M. (1998). Consequences of perceiving oneself as responsible for obtaining a discount: Evidence for smart-shopper feelings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(4), 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effect of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality–value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R. K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 28(2), 278–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbacker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference price on consumer perceptions and price search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X., & Huang, J. (2014). Effects of price discounts and bonus packs on online impulse buying. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 42(8), 1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Page 2

Factor/item Factor loading CR AVE Cronbach’s alpha
Perceived savings   .94 .85 .93
 The amount of discount offered on the pair of jeans represents large savings .91    
 The amount of money that customers would save on the pair of jeans is very large .93    
 The amount of discount stated for the pair of jeans is very high .93    
Perceived quality   .92 .73 .92
 This pair of jeans would be reliable .86    
 This pair of jeans would be dependable .86    
 This pair of jeans would be durable .89    
 The workmanship on this pair of jeans would be good .81    
Perceived value   .93 .87 .93
 This pair of jeans is a good value for the money .94    
 This pair of jeans is a good buy .93    
 At the price shown, this pair of jeans is economicala .49    
Price discount affect   .92 .73 .91
 How do you feel after seeing this price discount?     
  Happy–unhappy .92    
  Pleased–annoyed .93    
  Content–melancholic .77    
  Excited–calm .79    
  Aroused–unarouseda .49    
  Stimulated–relaxeda .48    
Purchase intentions   .96 .90 .96
 I would consider buying this pair of jeans with this price discount .93    
 There is a strong likelihood that I would buy this pair of jeans with this price discount .95    
 I would purchase this pair of jeans with this price discount .96    

  1. The values of CR, AVE, and Cronbach’s alpha shown in the table were calculated after the three items were removed
  2. CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted
  3. aThese three items were removed because the factor loadings were smaller than .50

Postingan terbaru

LIHAT SEMUA